Introduction Construction adjudication under the regime of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act, 2012 (“CIPAA”) has developed to a reasonably mature state in Malaysia. The bulk of application under CIPAA is from the enforcement and setting applications made to the High Court once an adjudication decision is issued. CIPAA further provides an exemption to a limited […]

Introduction There is much debate on the extent of adjudicators’ powers and jurisdiction under section 25 of the Construction Industry Payment And Adjudication Act, 2012 (“CIPAA”). While there are several permutations on this issue, the few top trending questions are:- (i) is the adjudicator bound to pick between either submission made by the parties in the adjudication […]

Introduction The Malaysian Construction Industry Payment And Adjudication Act, 2012 [“CIPAA”] allows a sub-contractor who has obtained an adjudication decision in their favour to claim against the principal of the construction project concerned. Ordinarily, the sub-contractor would enforce their favourable adjudication decision against the main contractor but there may be instances where it would be […]

Summary or Take-Away Points: Construction adjudication provides for a quicker and simpler way for contractors to claim for their unpaid construction claims. The law governing construction adjudication in Malaysia is the Construction Industry Payment And Adjudication Act, 2012. The “appointing authority” and “administrator” for construction adjudication in Malaysia is the Asian International Arbitration Centre (formerly […]